E-Maps vs paper maps Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

E-Maps vs paper maps - Essay Example However, when a different paper map was given, the details were easily seen and accuracy was consistent while moving through the map. There was also the ability to get a general idea of the surroundings and where to move to next because the map isn’t limited by one location. The results with the GPS is one which was limited by only showing how far one needs to go to get to the location without having options for alternative paths. This leads to a lack in time and the inability to get alternative coordinates. There were also difficulties with the GPS because it didn’t pinpoint all the landmarks accurately. The interpretation of these results could lead to difficulties in trying to find the best options for getting to different points. The GPS, while working for those who want to get to a location with the easiest route and a step-by-step guide, would work effectively. However, there is a large amount of possibility for error, specifically because alternative coordinates can’t be identified and the overall changes in the system can’t be given when one goes in a different direction. The inability to show more than one point to a location while focusing on the time instead of space can lead to several errors and misinterpretations. However, a faulty map can be just as confusing as it may miss landmarks or can lead to misreadings. The advantage this has over the GPS is one can see the complete picture of their location, find alternative routes and can easily replace the map with a better guide. The GPS; however, remains with the automated expectations and can only give limited information. Twitter When using the Twitter map, I found that the same results appeared as the GPS. There were good directions and the ability to look at details, landscapes and various... The paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of E-Maps. The GPS, while working for those who want to get to a location with the easiest route and a step-by-step guide, would work effectively. However, there is a large amount of possibility for error, specifically because alternative coordinates can’t be identified and the overall changes in the system can’t be given when one goes in a different direction. The inability to show more than one point to a location while focusing on the time instead of space can lead to several errors and misinterpretations. However, a faulty map can be just as confusing as it may miss landmarks or can lead to misreadings. The advantage this has over the GPS is one can see the complete picture of their location, find alternative routes and can easily replace the map with a better guide. The GPS, however, remains with the automated expectations and can only give limited information. When using the Twitter map, I found that the same re sults appeared as the GPS. There were good directions and the ability to look at details, landscapes and various angles that were used. There was also the ability to look at the various parts of the area, specifically which was seen in real time. The particular downfall of this GPS system makes it easier for the person using the system to only use the Twitter Map as a physical map. The qualities which work with this are based on the ability to see the different alternatives when looking at the roads from a distance.