History Part B

Controlled assessment part b i. authority 1 is from the The position patrol Force A Political and Social History written by Clive Emsley, published in 1991. It suggests that the police were unable(p) at halt/preventing major crimes such as robbery. However, they were effective at stopping kid crimes in the local community. reppresentation 2 is A Plaint by a Pliceman, a poem published in trailer magazine in the late nineteenth century.It alike suggests that the police were ineffective at stopping/preventing major crimes and that limited the effectiveness of the Police. However, the image as well as suggests that the police were effective at stopping/preventing minor crimes but that was seen as stoping little boys from playing ball. Representations 1 and 2 call for a number of exchangeableities. First of all Rep 1 and 2 limn the electro ostracise attitude towards the Police. This is shown by belief among many of the working kinfolk that there was a justness for the rich and a nonher, harsher law, for the poor.In some atomic number 18as, they allowed fights and other law breaking activities, which they wouldve acted against elsewhere. From delegation 2, i can spot that it agrees with archetype 1 as it says The streets re quite unsecured they say, Youre robbed and mobbed in broad noonday But little boys they mustnt play. Representation 1 also gives the impression that the Police were up to(p) of preventing petty crimes but they differ in t champion. This is shown by what the police were specially good at, was apprehending those who committed petty street offences . Representation 2 is similar and i know this from Stop little boys from playing ball, or resettlement away an apple stall. Finally, Representation 1 suggests that the police themselves were not to blame for their ineffectiveness. I know this from The police never had sufficient workforce to suppress disorder entirely. Representation 2 is similar as it suggests Well, if from growls you can refrain, it aint of us you should complain Youve got thank SIR RICHARD MAYNE. Representation 1 and 2 have a number of contrarietys.First of all Rep 1 gives a negative view towards the police but it differs in attitude compared to Representation 2. This shown by the fact that Representation 1 gives negative view towards the police but it gives some positives of the Police, therefore giving balance argument. However, Representation 2 gives a generally one sided view of the police, which is negative. The representation doesnt seem to take into account the other side of Policing, creating a one-sided and biased view. Both representations differ in tone.I know this as Representation 1 gives an academic style, due to the language use of goods and servicesd. You must also take into account that its from a textbook. Meaning that it will have to be fair when creating a judgement of the Police. Representation 1 tends to use words such as however and although. Representation 2 is w hole one sided being exaggerated. Emotional language is used, in order to figure of speech a negative view image of the police. I know this from the exaggeration and comparison of petty street offenders to boys They bids me chivvy little boysIn inference the two representations are mostly different as the first representation gives a balanced view making a conclusion at the end after evaluating all points. Whereas, the 2nd Representation gives a negative focus and tone towards the Police without even considering the usefulness of the police. The main indicate for this is Representation 1 concludes that Although theyworking class may not have liked the Police, they make that the police force were there to protect and serve the community.By final in this manner, it shows that there is an understanding as to why the police are judged in a certain way but gave a earth as to why the Police were existent and that was to put order in society. Whereas, Representation 2 portrays the Po lice as useless when considering all the crimes that the Police should prevent. Representation 2 considers the Police as muckle who only put a plaster on the wound sort of than healing the wound, in a sense. The downside for Representation 2 is that it is completely one sided which allows a lot of criticism to be made.The most important areas of disagreement is the tone and focus. I say this because, there is a clear difference because of the tone and focus. Representation 1 is a formal and factual particle focusing on all aspects of policing, thus, allowing the endorser to understand the Police decently and leave the reader to make his own judgement. However, when it comes to Representation 2, the piece is cosy and focuses only on the negative aspects of the Police. The piece doesnt allow the reader to make his own judgement fairly.